Choices, Choices, Choices…

If you are a reader, one thing you will know for certain: no matter how many hours you read each day or how fast you read or how long you live, you will never have time to read more than a mere fraction of all the books there are to be read or even of the ones you would like to read. So…how do you choose? I will be really interested in what you have to say below.


How do I choose? There is no single answer, and sometimes I don’t even know quite why I read a certain book. But here are some criteria I follow:

–I read a great deal by author. Once I have discovered a writer whose books I enjoy, I will often buy on the name alone without having to see the cover or read the blurb or look at any reviews. I am rarely if ever let down by such writers as Georgette Heyer, Louise Penny, M. C. Beaton, Donna Leon, Susan Elizabeth Phillips, or Grace Burrowes, to name just a few.

–more and more lately, thanks largely to my author Facebook page, I read by recommendation. If a reader seems really taken by a particular book, I will look it up, read about it, and decide if it might appeal to me. I have made some really great discoveries this way–Jean Webster’s Daddy Long-Legs and Graeme Simonson’s The Rosie Project, for example, and the books of Ed McBain and Patricia Wentworth.


–I have a Kindle (a museum piece which I love) and check the Kindle Daily Deal each day. I don’t buy many of the offerings, but there have been some that I have loved, most recently Kay Bratt’s The Scavenger’s Daughters. A bonus pleasure with that particular book, and, in fact, with many discoveries, is that there are sequels, which I will definitely be reading.

–It is said that we ought not to judge a book by its cover, and that can be very true, but I do get attracted by certain covers and/or titles and stop to investigate. A few days ago it was Claire Cook’s The Wildwater Walking Club, which I thoroughly enjoyed, and yesterday it was Karen McQuestion’s Hello Love, which I am loving. Both authors have other books and will be added to my automoatic-buy list. And there are the quirky titles, like The 100-Year-Old Man Who Climbed Out the Window and Disappeared (Jonas Jonasson) and The Unlikely Pilgrimage of Harold Fry (Rachel Joyce), both of which books are in my Kindle Favorites folder.

–and sometimes I will read a book only because I am hearing so much about it that finally I cave in to see if I can discover what all the fuss is about. I have discovered some real gems this way–the Harry Potter (J. K. Rowling) books (but only to Book 5–they were getting too long and unedited for my taste and had lost the sheer charm of the earlier offerings), The Book Thief (Marcus Zusak), The Hunger Games, to name a few.

–and then there are the books that the universe drops in my lap, not literally, perhaps, since they are books I somehow buy and read, though I can never remember afterward exactly why I did so. Why did I read Roland Merullo’s Breakfast with Buddha or Sharon Draper’s Out of My Mind or Brad Willis’s Warrior Pose? I don’t know, but I am very glad I did!


Please make your own comment below. I will love reading them. To two randomly chosen persons who comment before the end of Tuesday, Sept. 30, I will send my remaining two advance reading copies (with plain covers) of ONLY ENCHANTING, one month before its publication date on October 28.




And The Winners Are…

The two winners of signed Advance Reading copies of ONLY ENCHANTING offered in my blog on villainous villains are Menna Withington and Cristina Harvey. Congratulations to them and thanks to all of you who left a comment. I always enjoy reading those. Stay tuned–I will be giving away my final two copies toward the end of September, a month before the publication of the book!

Villainous Villains?

Among the questions I solicited from you a while ago were these three:
–From Edea Baldwin: “Have you ever written a character that you disliked intensely? Or must you feel some affinity with any character you write?”
–From Jeanette Harris: “Which of your characters have you liked the least and why?”
Shelia Hudnall: “Just how often does a secondary character morph into a primary character for you? How often are you surprised when that happens? Or does it surprise you at all?”

I have created my fair share of villains. There are a few I would make different if I were to write the book now, because I don’t like what I think of as “silly” villains–that is, those who are evil for the sake of being evil and enjoy it. I think of some cartoon villains in that category. I like to consider the whole complexities of the human condition when I create characters, whether they be heroes and heroines or villains or neither. And with very few exceptions (I am not going to touch upon that possible extreme here) no person is purely evil. There are reasons for what people do, so numerous that I don’t think I can even begin to give examples. And most of us are a bewildering mix of good and bad. We are human!  I like to create heroes and heroines in whom good ultimately prevails, though never in a purely happily-ever-after way. As the hero of the book I have just finished (ONLY A KISS, Imogen’s story) says almost at the end: “I want you to love me for my sorry self, which I will try very hard for the rest of my life to make worthy of you–and worthy of me. I can do it. We can always do anything as long as we are alive. We can always change, grow, evolve into a far better version of ourselves. It is surely what life is for.”

There are a few villains in my books that I regret. One of them is in HEARTLESS, which will be republished next summer. I have left him as he is, however, as I always think it is a bigger mistake to change an older book, when one is coming at it from a wholly different life perspective. I have a number of other villains who are unredeemed at the end and have never been redeemed in future books, though some readers have asked that it happen. Some of you may remember Lionel, villain in both DARK ANGEL and LORD CAREW’S BRIDE. I have never redeemed him, though I think I could! He is very human, but he had allowed self absorption and a good bit of sadism to dominate his character. The fact that he looks like an angel does not help him. Having created him and been inside his head, I can see that such a man is very unlikely to change unless he has to face some really cataclysmic event in his life. I prefer to let realism prevail in cases like Lionel. The same applies to a number of other villains in my books. They must be allowed to live the life they have chosen–or rather (to be fair to them) the life I have chosen for them!


And then there are the villains I have redeemed. Sometimes poor or downright wrong choices can land people in deep darkness. It is often easier to remain in it, especially if there are addictions involved, and even to spiral downward. And sometimes people, speaking and acting from such a place, do downright nasty things and cause other people to suffer. To emerge from the darkness, to make some right choices and keep on making them, to build a will of iron and an ability to take one step at a time without being discouraged by how many need to be taken, is obviously incredibly difficult. We all probably know such people or at least know OF them. But if they can do it–oh my goodness! My character Freddie was pretty nasty in COURTING JULIA, even going as far as to kidnap the heroine so that she would have to marry him and solve his money woes. And even at the start of his own book, DANCING WITH CLARA, he is plotting marriage to a plain, crippled woman who is also rich. But when Clara accepts his offer, she does so because he is beautiful and there has been little beauty in her life. She is not deceived for one moment by his apparent ardor. Freddie has to face suitable torture during the rest of the book before he emerges as a worthy hero for Clara as the end. I LOVE redeeming villains or bringing characters from a dark place to the light.


Does it surprise me when a secondary character in one book morphs into a primary character in another? Sometimes it is planned. Very often it is not. I will be searching around in my head for a suitable heroine for a hero I have in mind (or vice versa) and find the perfect character embedded in a previous book. I needed a heroine for Ann Jewell in SIMPLY LOVE, and up popped Sydnam Butler. I had not created either one of them to end up with the other. I needed a heroine for Flavian in the upcoming ONLY ENCHANTING and remembered that at the end of THE ARRANGEMENT he had danced with Sophia’s friend, Agnes Keeping. Guess who the heroine of ONLY ENCHANTING is. It is always lovely to discover a ready-made hero or heroine instead of having to start from nothing.


I have two more advance reading copies (uncorrected proofs, plain paper cover) of ONLY ENCHANTING, due out on October 28, to give away. I will send them to two people who leave a comment below before the end of August. Good luck!




And The Winners Are…

The winners of the blog contest on the confessions of a non-researcher are Elise Farthing and Barbara Waltz. They will each be receiving a signed copy of an Advance Reading edition of ONLY ENCHANTING. Congratulations to them and thanks to the more than 400 who left a comment. I thoroughly enjoyed reading them all.


I have been wanting to blog here again for some time, but I always have the problem of what to write about. It’s strange, that, isn’t it, when I make my living out of dreaming up and writing stories? I finally went back to the multitude of questions a number of you asked when I asked a while ago for help with topics. And I came across this one from someone I know only by the name Becky:

“How did you research the specific ailments of the Survivors’ Club heroes to get their realistic Points of View? How much of it was just straight research and how much of it was talking to people with similar experiences? If you did a lot of talking to real people, how did you find them?”

And here comes the confession: I do almost no research of matters pertaining to character–as opposed to all the research I had to do for the Regency period itself and the Napoleonic Wars and other factual stuff. Everything else comes purely from my imagination. I do believe I have the ability to put myself imaginatively in the place of most types of people and know just what it feels like to be them. One pleasant result of this is that I am very rarely judgmental. I always know where the most unpleasant-seeming people are “coming from.” Another pleasant result is that I can create stories for the most complex and difficult heroes and heroines.


It is a risk to write this way, of course. I could arouse a storm of protest if I ever get some sort of character horribly wrong. It has not happened yet (fingers crossed). When I wrote SILENT MELODY with its 18th century deaf mute heroine, for example, I could only imagine what it must be like to be deaf in an age when people assume you must be insane. But I heard from several people afterward that I got it absolutely right (whew!). Incidentallly, that book will be out again next summer as a trade paperback. And since THE ARRANGEMENT has been published, I have heard from blind people who tell me I got Vincent right.

For me one of the most exciting aspects of writing is creating difficult characters, jumping inside their skin and their minds and their souls, and living the story with them, often having no more idea than they do where it is headed. It feels like real life in a different persona. How would Hugo have felt in THE PROPOSAL, having not only survived some brutal military action in the Peninsular Wars, including a Forlorn Hope attack, which he led, but also escaped without even a scratch? Would he have been happy, delighted, cocky? Or would he have gone out of his mind with an extreme case of survivors’ guilt? The second reaction seemed the most probable, and it is the one I chose.

And what about Ben in THE ESCAPE? His whole life had been centred about his physical prowess and his military career–and then his legs were shattered beyond repair. Even after five years of determined therapy he could only hobble along with the aid of two specially-made canes. What would that do to his life? To his future? To his self-esteem? Would he merely withdraw to his estate, which would offer him a home and financial security for the rest of this life? Or would he have to find another path through life that would be as fulfilling to him as the old one? Would he find a way of accepting his limitations without being defeated by them? Or would he always feel that his life was an inferior thing, hardly worth living? Well, you can read the book to find what did happen to him. But keep in mind that I write heroes and heroines who triumph over life in their own way. Only so can they be considered heroes and heroines. Only so can they be capable of mature love and a lasting relationship.

Image 39

And what about Flavian, hero of ONLY ENCHANTING, due out in November? I can’t give away too many spoilers  because his book is not even out yet. But if you have read the other books in the series you will know that he spent three years at Penderris Hall recovering from head wounds sustained in a cavalry battle but that he seems to be fine again apart from a persistent stammer. You will also know that soon after he was wounded his beloved fiancée jilted him in order to marry his best friend–a double betrayal. What I had to ask myself when I came to writing his story was why exactly it took him three years to recover from his injuries, and what residual hurts are there apart from the stammer? What was the full extent of his brain damage and has he totally recovered from it? Can he ever? And what about the personal pain of his rejection by two of the people he loved most in the world? Oh, I love, love, love approaching a book with those sorts of questions in my mind.

In my own defence, I must add that I do not live with my head in the sand. Very few people these days could be unaware of the sorts of damage war does to the soldiers who are involved in it, even if they escape physical injury–and especially if they do. And sometimes I talk to people without any thought to doing research. I was in Starbucks just last week, fascinated by the sight of a man with hands but almost no arms, doing an intricate and gorgeous pencil drawing with his hands and his mouth. I got to talking to him and discovered that he had been a thalidomide baby, that he has a degree in fine arts, that he is currently working on a series of oil paintings of THE GREAT GATSBY, and a lot of other fascinating stuff. What an awesome person! He has certainly not been slowed down by a medical disaster that might have ruined his life.


To two people who leave a comment below before the end of next Monday, August 4, I will send an advance reading copy of ONLY ENCHANTING. Please note that it has a plain cover, not the one shown above, and that they are uncorrected proofs and may contain bloopers that will not (I hope) be there when the book is published in November.